Why I Switched To The Duck Duck Go Search Engine

DuckDuckGo tour

But it is still perceived as a lumbering slow giant. The case that everyone mentions is when, say, you type in the weather or you type in pizza and you want local weather or a local pizza place. Perl , [3] JavaScript , Python [4]. Complex search queries usually yielded results pages that would not help me in my research. Martin Brinkmann said on February 2, at 2: I keep getting irrelevant search results from duckduckgo… completely unrelated stuff.. Roy said on February 2, at 4:

Introducing DuckDuckGo

VT Replaces Google Custom Search with Duck Duck Go

But very quickly after that — I would have done it from the beginning had I actually thought about it, but I hadn't — was privacy. The data that you share with your search engine is the most personal data. Because you don't hold back with your search engine. You don't think about it in that context. You think "oh, I've got a financial problem … just type it in! It has [also] increasingly been used for marketing, it is available to subpoena and, as we know from the last year, it's also available through other hidden means for surveillance.

Most money a search engine makes comes from showing an ad for something commercial like a car or shoes when users search for them, and it doesn't impact that business model to not track. The reality shows that every time someone had tried to anonymise data, it's been a failure. As long as you can tie searches together and you keep any shred of the information, any personal information that can tie things back to you, then I think it's not truly private. No, I do have a philosophical opposition.

I think of it as more privacy policy than general. I think they should be set up to be the minimal collection as needed, as opposed to the maximal collection possible.

The other way to look at that is I think they should have a quid pro quo, which is "you're giving up this particular piece of personal information and you're getting this benefit in return", as opposed to the current status quo, which is "we will collect anything we can and not tell you what the benefits are", just say, in general, "sure, you'll benefit from this".

I think that is the key difference. And you've seen some companies start to move to this direction, but very slowly. I believe you can switch to us today, and you'll be fine. And you can have a better experience! But also, if you look at your Google searches and what's coming up, really the amount that they're using your search history to change the search results is minimal. They are not really using that data currently to improve your search results in any significant way — as far as we can tell.

They're using it for other things. They're using it to track you across the ad network. We've not backed off! I guess to restate my case I don't think that personal data, that personalisation, has been very useful.

The case that everyone mentions is when, say, you type in the weather or you type in pizza and you want local weather or a local pizza place. So, we can do that in our instant answer box — using your location on the fly, and not store it — and not change the actual link results.

So I think most of what people want that they call personalisation is really localisation and we can do that without tracking people. It's real, and it already is happening, and will be increased. My general view is that if information is out there that can lead companies to improve their profits, then they will do so unless it's regulated against.

Why did you set up DuckDuckGo in ? DuckDuckGo is based in the small town of Paoli, Pennsylvania. How much do you think that the location puts you outside the general Silicon Valley milieu? After all these years, it seems as if people are finally talking about privacy … Yes, I do think that's fair.

Topics Google The Observer. The barebones approach cited in his quote have since changed; DuckDuckGo now has auto-completion and instant results for example. McCracken included the site in Time' s list of "50 Best Websites of ". Thom Holwerda, who reviewed the search engine for OSNews , praised its privacy features and shortcuts to site-specific searches as well as criticizing Google for "track[ing] pretty much everything you do", particularly because of the risk of such information being subject to a U.

Weinberg was reportedly "pleased and entertained" by that acknowledgment. DuckDuckGo Twitter account duckduckgo , 18 June [60] [61] [62].

In June , DuckDuckGo indicated that it had seen a significant traffic increase; according to the website's Twitter account, on Monday, June 17, , it had three million daily direct searches. On average during May , it had 1. Danny Sullivan wrote on Search Engine Land that despite the search engine's growth "it's not grown anywhere near the amount to reflect any substantial or even mildly notable switching by the searching public" for reasons due to privacy, and he concluded "No One Cares About "Private" Search".

As of August , DDG was receiving 23 million direct queries per day. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about the search engine. For the children's game, see Duck, duck, goose. We didn't invest in it because we thought it would beat Google. We invested in it because there is a need for a private search engine. We did it for the Internet anarchists, people that hang out on Reddit and Hacker News.

It took 1, days to get 1M searches, days to get 2M searches, and then just 8 days to pass 3M searches: Retrieved 2 May Retrieved 14 September Archived from the original on March 17, Retrieved March 19, Retrieved March 6, Archived from the original on January 24, Retrieved April 29, Retrieved June 11, Retrieved July 10, Retrieved July 20, Retrieved March 19, — via GitHub.

Retrieved September 30, Retrieved November 11, Retrieved September 25, Retrieved December 4, Retrieved August 8, Retrieved January 28, Retrieved May 10, Retrieved February 10, Retrieved July 21, Union Square Ventures blog. Retrieved October 14, Retrieved January 29, Retrieved May 14, Retrieved 26 September Retrieved June 6, Retrieved 4 June Retrieved July 22, Retrieved Jul 7, Archived from the original on 31 Dec Retrieved August 19, Retrieved 27 January The Privacy-centric Alternative to Google".

It took days to get 1M Archived from the original on 6 June Retrieved 16 October

Navigation menu